Balu der Bär

You are most welcome!!!!

Ideologiefrei ist das Ganze nicht zwingend. Auf der einen Seite hält man den Feminismus hoch auf der anderen Seite die pösen Massenvernichtungs- Jagdwaffen. Also Plus und Minus. Daraus ensteht die gefühlte Neutralität, weil sich die beiden Extreme gegenseitig aufheben..

Tja das frage ich mich auch, wenn ich immer mehr Leute erlebe, für die der Besitz eines Gegenstandes schon ausreicht, einen Menschen zu stigmatisieren und zu verunglimpfen...

Nun was aber die Parteien aus dem rot grünen Spektrum besonders charakterisiert, ist, dass die einzig erlaubte Antwort auf Zukunftsfragen der Verzicht zu sein scheint..... Und hinzu komm für mich die Erinnerung aus dem Kunstunterricht, dass wenn man rot und grün mischt,, braun daraus wird....

Merke: Jede Partei schreit nach Verboten, wenn sie keine Lösungen für die Praxis bereitstellen kann. Und gerade die Roten und die Grünen haben bislang die wenigsten Lösungsvorschläge machen können.

Hä? Wat´n dat?? Is das was ansteckendes??

KLICK!

You just don´t get it, or? For me it is not beeing anti- islam in general. It is about beeing opposed to islamic extremists. Anf if you did some research- which is btw somewhat compulsory to take part in a discussion- you should have learned something about the CV of Mrs gabriel. She was born in Lebanon as a Christian, forced to live in an underground shelter, wounded by a shrapnell and emigrated to the US finally. So she should have a better idea, how the practical islamic radficalism takes place on a daily basis. ANd she also stated it is not the majority. The majority is always irrelelvant.....

Richtig, ändert aber nix an der Tatsache, dass es funktioniert....

Das G3 doch auch, die MP5 auch.....

Ich persönlich finde es komisch, das H&K plötzlich nicht mehr gute Waffen bauen soll. Die haben das SA80 sich vorgenommen --> funktioniert Die haben das H416 rausgebracht --> funktioniert G3 --> funktioniert Finde ich persönlich komisch......

Die hätten damals das G41 nehmen sollen.....

Sorry for having a real life. No reason to get smart here.... I also got the fun part of your statement above, that the man who often bypasses Congress and some other parts of the legeslative protocol, seems to act like a sponsor and judge all at the same time. Wasn´t this the President, who wanted to bomb Syria in order to restore human rights, which aren´t compatible to the human rights defined in the CDHRI from 1990? Is that the same president, who doesn´t trust his own people for owning firearms, now wants to sign a nuclear deal with Iran? This president looks like a deer in the headlights to many people, everytime a new international problem arises. He speaks of unintended consequences?? Ok, Bush wasn´t even better, but the withdrawl of allied forces in Iraq was conducive to the rise of IS. Now with the 60 country coalition he wants to slowly push IS out of Iraq. Interesting. Where to and how?? He mentioned himself, that missing education, missing opportunities are to be blamed for radiacalized Muslims who turns into Islamists. He indirectly blames religious processes for that. Klick here for the statement Funny is also the fact, that he mentioned Libya. Wasn´t he the Commander In Chief, when they bombed the shit out of Gaddafi?? He is also pushing the point of education. Interesting. What kind of education?? Beware of secular humanism. This is gonna be a joy to behold.... Yeah, you are absolutely right, this is so funny, that I am close to be flabbergasted. No. With this statement you proved instantly, that you are far away from understanding humanistic principles. As far as I´m concerned, they could run their Islamistic State down there. I wouldn´t care at all. The problem is, that they are going out on a mission to spread their believe by force. Btw. your list of islamic states, which have a long and extensive history of the freedom of religions is still missing here. Why are you keeping this door to enlightment shut?? The points which are outlined in the video of Mr. Connell will fit on any militant religion. That´s why. And I am currently not aware, if Christians or Hindus or Buddhists were recently flying airliners into tall buildings or commiting suicide attacks in western states. If you can provide some intel on other groups than islamic ones, this will be greatly appriciated. I tried to find any incidents, which could fit to any religious believe besides Islam and I was forced to put the ballpen aside, because it was kinda narrowed down to the Islamists. You also tend to mix up bashing with fierce criticism. You weren´t able so far, to falsify any of the points mentioned by Mr. Connell and the guys here in this forum labeled by yourself as Islamophobics. You failed to provide any evidence for your statements. One piece of advise: Never forget the first rule of holes. If you are in one, stop digging!!! No politics and government have to be in peoples mind on a mandatory basis. With no one thinking about this, how can one take part in an election? Or be a citizen in a democracy? Please don´t express the need to have a lecture on that..... If a individual wants to be a kept man, then he doesn´t need to be bothered with politics and government affairs. That is absolutely right. Here in the western states, we use for this principle the mainstream media. Remember the extensive, bloody well researched and sourced background informations on firearms..... The same principles are to be followed in the IS. Everyone has to swallow the preaches of the Mullah and believe him without verifying them, and everything is gonna be AOK?? Is it that what you are trying to propose here?? Do you also have the german newspaper "BILD" on your subscription list? You fear fear?? Interesting. Rather than cultivating a phobia, I tend to iron out the circumstances which are making me feel frightened. This implies the necessity, that I recognize my freedom and the duties and the rights which come with it. Any threat to these- in form of religious bigots for instance - have to be considered and the necessary corrective actions are to be taken. I said it once before: I have no objections at all against any religious believe. There are good christians, muslims, hindus, buddhists. No doubt about it. But how you can differ between a radical follower and the normal one? Easy to be answered: The good ones keep the belief out of society, out of government, out of school, out of the workplace. In other words: They don´t take their believe too seriously. They keep it checked and balanced with common sense and humanistic elements. Personal note: In regards to your signature: I am not fond to give up any freedom of our society just to provide any socio- cultural commodities to a minority, which doesn´t accept our way of life and our principles to its entirety. Enough heat??

Thank you. But I go for the extra mile in rejecting any man made religion ( btw. there is nothing else in religious business than man- made). I don´t reject and oppose the personal belief of the individual. Whatever you do in day to day life, one must not forget: Common Sense is King! I once had a discussion with our local priest. He urged to prove my atheist theories. My reply was: Prove first that there is actually any god. The look of his face was pricleless. For all other things there are the credit cards......